This is a Festival review of the Surprise Film, Contagion (2011)
More views of - or after - Cambridge Film Festival 2011
(Click here to go directly to the Festival web-site)
8 October (Tweets added, 21 July 2015)
This is a Festival review of the Surprise Film, Contagion (2011)
I’m not imagining that I understand, not having looked at it, much about the spread of disease and its control. However, I cannot believe the following sort of scenario, without seeing some credible evidence that it makes real biological sense:
If a fox, detected in a chicken-run, drops something that it has been eating in its flight, and that food is not only palatable to the chickens, but is also infected with a virus that the fox has had, the chicken (or chickens) that eats its, merely by having eaten that food, will give rise to a fox/chicken-type virus (whose genotyping will show origins in both the fox and the chicken).
If the chicken is then, sadly, run over, its blood will be infected with the virus, and another species that comes into contact with it will (or could) contract the virus that it contains.
As I say, it may be that I know nothing about the matter, but this seems about as simplistic as thinking that, because certain foods contain more anti-oxidants than others, because anti-oxidants will react with and neutralize free radicals, and because free radicals can react with cells to give rise to ageing and cancer, eating those foods will reduce one’s liability to those undesirable effects.
-> It is gathered that the mechanisms both of initial infection and of its transference were criticized.
— THE AGENT APSLEY (@THEAGENTAPSLEY) July 21, 2015
If you want to Tweet, Tweet away here
No comments:
Post a Comment